The issue of smartphones for navigation in the hills has reared its controversial head again following a BBC website piece with the title "Hillwalkers warned more than a phone needed to navigate mountains" and containing the statement "Some people do not realise phones will just switch off at cold temperatures, leaving them stranded", which is simply untrue. More sensible was the advice from Mountaineering Scotland safety advisor Ben Gibson recommending not just relying on a phone and advising carrying a map and compass as well plus a power bank.
I've written about navigating with phones a few times before but thought I'd expand my thoughts a little here and also post a review of three smartphones designed for outdoor use that recently appeared in The Great Outdoors magazine.
Perhaps the most important point to make is that smartphones, maps, compasses, and GPS units are just tools and to be useful you need to know how to use them and what their limitations are. They're not magic. Map reading is a skill needed whether your map is on a screen or printed.
Now I've been around so long that when I began hillwalking mobile phones and GPS satellites were the stuff of science fiction. Map and compass were the only options. I learnt to use them and couldn't imagine ever not having them. However those much younger have grown up with mobiles and GPS and undoubtedly can't imagine not having them. Suggesting that the tools they are familiar with shouldn't be used or don't work in the hills and they should stick to the old ones is futile and I suspect makes it likely that all the advice of people who say this will be rejected. I know that's what I would have done. If you know someone is wrong about something why trust them on anything else?
That said, having options is wise. Phones can fail or break, though it's never happened to me and I've been using them for navigation for well over a decade. Printed maps can blow away or tear and if paper can get soaked (I prefer ones on plastic). Both have happened to me in the past. Compasses are not infallible either as I discovered many decades ago, long before GPS let alone smartphones, when I walked off the wrong side of Ben More on the island of Mull, following a compass bearing, and discovered that if there are magnetic rocks around compasses can be 180ยบ out. Much more recently I had a compass suffer reverse polarity so the needle pointed south not north, though not accurately enough to use it safely. Whether you use GPS or map and compass as your main navigation tool if you have both you have a backup in case of failure. Or of course two phone. Or two compasses.
Teaching people how to use a phone for navigation is the way forward, not telling them it won't work. Often problems with using phones for navigation comes down to a lack of skill and knowledge not the failure of the phone. If all you have on the phone is Google maps you'll probably get lost, as you will if all you have is a printed road map. If you're reliant on a preset route, whether downloaded to a phone or in a printed guidebook, and can't map read then you may have problems if you lose the route. Tools have to be the right ones and you need to know how to use them.
There are many mapping and hiking apps. I currently use OS Maps. Alex Roddie wrote a useful review of apps for The Great Outdoors recently.
"The battery will run out", is often given as a reason for not using a phone for navigation. If you know how to maximise battery life this should not be so (put it in airplane mode most of the time). Carrying a battery charger is wise too. Also, consider a phone with a big battery or one with a replaceable battery (see my reviews below).
A myth is that phones won't work for navigation without a phone signal. This isn't true as the phone uses GPS satellite signals to show your position not wifi or 4G/5G. You do need to download the maps so they can be used offline - you probably won't be able to do that in the hills.
Whether printed or digital a map for the hills should have contours and other symbols that, when you know how to read them, shows what the terrain is like. In Britain that means the Ordnance Survey or Harvey maps. I do nearly all my navigation with a map. These days it's usually one on my smartphone, though I do carry a printed one as backup and to look at in camp.
For planning I use a mixture of screen maps and printed maps. On screen I can draw routes and let the software workout distance and ascents. Printed maps I can spread out over the floor and visualise routes over huge areas, a great way to dream. I love maps. I can spend hours poring over them, studying landscapes and planning routes.
I still always carry a compass though it may not be used most days. Because I'm so familiar with using one in poor visibility I sometimes get my position on the phone, note the direction I want to take, and then transfer it to the compass as a bearing. I do keep the compass and phone apart though - close together the phone may cause reverse polarity in the compass. Don't carry them in the same pocket!
Summing up: good navigational skills are essential in the hills. And the key one is being able to read a map, whether it’s on paper or on a screen. The latest smartphones are efficient GPS units and with good downloaded maps can be used for navigation. Indeed, being able to pinpoint your position on a map on the screen should make it harder to get lost. A battery pack or spare battery should ensure you don't run out of power. And just in case something does goes wrong, carrying a paper map and a compass or a second phone as a back up is wise..
Then in 2018 Land Rover launched a phone designed for hillwalking and the outdoors. The Explore looked like a slightly bigger standard phone and had all the features of the rugged phones plus much better specs. I took it on the GR5 trail through the Alps and enjoyed having a phone I didn’t have to treat carefully. When I went back to my standard phone I found I resented needing a case so when I replaced it I looked for a rugged phone and was pleased to discover there were now a number of options as well as the Explore.
Having now been using rugged phones for the last year and a half I can’t imagine going back to a standard one. I love having a phone that doesn’t require looking after. I’m now used to ignoring rain, putting my phone down on snow and mud, and slipping it into a pack or jacket pocket knowing it won’t come to harm if I bang it on something. Dropping it isn’t a worry either, though ironically rugged phones are designed to be non-slip. I like not needing a case too. Without one the rugged phones reviewed here are only slightly heavier and barely any bigger than a standard equivalent phone with one. And if the phone gets dirty you can easily wipe it clean.
There are now quite a few rugged smartphones suited to outdoor use. I’ve compared three that I’ve used extensively here. All of them have excellent waterproof, dustproof, and drop specifications. The cameras are all adequate but no more. The other specs are fine for most uses but they’re not as fast as top-end smartphones (or anything like as expensive). However, for the hills they are superb.
Land Rover Explore R 225 grams £249. ***1/2
Pros customisable dashboard, cost
Cons battery life, screen colour
Size 160 x 76 x11mm
Weight 225 grams
Operating system Android 9/10
Battery 3100mAh
Memory 64GB, micro-SD slot
Cameras 12 MP f1.8 rear, 8MP front
Rather than an update to 2018’s Land Rover Explore this is a new phone with a different design and software. The durability aspects remain though, and it works in temperatures between -30°C and +65°. The screen is protected by Corning Gorilla glass and can be used with gloves or wet fingers. It’s recessed to give extra protection if dropped. The battery is 3,100 mAh, which Land Rover says is enough for 1.5 days with “medium-to-heavy” use.
Although the Explore R is the same size as the Samsung XCover Pro the display is smaller. It also has a slight yellowish colour tinge. However, I soon forgot about this in use. The display is bright and easily visible in sunshine. The screen works with gloves and wet fingers
For mapping the Explore R comes with the OS Maps app and a free 12-month premium subscription.
Like the first Explore the Explore R has a customisable Dashboard page that can give useful information such as sunrise and sunset times, altitude, and compass direction. Some of the information can only be updated with a phone signal though. Other information uses GPS.
I’ve used the Explore R for over a year in every type of weather without any extra protection and it’s always worked fine. There’s a dull finish to the sides and a rough textured back so it can safely be held in one hand.
I think the big drawback of the Explore R is the battery. It will last the 1.5 days claimed, though it’s easy to shorten that if you’re not careful. For a trip longer than a day a battery pack is essential.
https://landroverexplore.co.uk
Motorola Defy 235g £279 ****1/2 £279 Best Buy
Overall Rating ****1/2
Likes large screen, powerful battery life, cost
Dislikes nothing
Size 170 x 78 x 11mm
Weight 235 grams
Operating system Android 10
Battery 5000 mAh
Memory 64GB, micro SD slot
Cameras 48MP f1.8 main, 8MP front
Cost £279
The Defy is the biggest phone reviewed yet only weighs a few grams more than the others. The sides and back have a raised, ribbed pattern for a secure grip that’s the best of the three phones. The temperature operating range is -25° to 55°C. The recessed screen is Corning Gorilla glass for protection.
Other than the standard Google apps there’s no preinstalled software so you need to download mapping and other outdoor apps.
The big plus of the Defy is the massive 5000 mAh battery. Using the phone to record my route, check my position on the map occasionally, take a dozen and more photos, send a few texts, and even upload images to social media when there’s a signal the battery lasts two days. With careful use I can make that three.
The Defy arrived for testing at the end of last summer and I’ve used it through the autumn and winter without any problems and without treating it carefully. It’s worked fine in rain and in snow and in temperatures well below freezing. The screen is bright in any light and works with wet fingers and gloves. I like the large size but those with smaller hands may find it a bit more difficult to hold.
The big battery and large screen make this my Best Buy of the three phones, especially as the cost is quite low.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro 232g £469 **** Recommended
Overall Rating ****
Likes replaceable battery
Dislikes quite expensive
Size 160 x 76 x 10mm
Weight 232 grams
Operating system Android 10
Battery 4050 mAh
Memory 64GB, micro SD slot
Cameras 25mp f1.7 wide angle & 8mp ultra-wide angle rear, 13mp front
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is the most expensive phone reviewed. It does have a better camera than the others and a fairly powerful battery that lasts well. The big plus point though is that the battery is replaceable. This has two advantages. The first is that a spare battery only weighs 76 grams, far less than a battery pack of the same capacity. The second is that if the battery runs out you can just replace it and continue using the phone straight away rather than having to attach it to a battery pack. The battery itself lasts me two days with reasonably careful use.
To change the battery the rear of the phone has to be removed. I was concerned this might be a weak point but after over a year’s use it’s as waterproof and dustproof as ever.
The XCover Pro is designed for construction sites and dusty and dirty workplaces rather than the hills and there are no mapping or other apps and a few features that aren’t really relevant for the outdoors. However, it is very tough and comes with three years guaranteed software and security updates (the other phones have two years).
The phone has a roughened back and matt finish rather than shiny sides to give a secure grip. The size is just right for me to use comfortably in one hand. The screen is only slightly recessed and fills more of the front of the phone than the screens on the other phones. Again, I thought this might be a weak point but so far it’s been fine.
Great article. One thing I've found is that when it rains heavily I can't use my touch screen (I think the phone thinks the rain drops are fingers). Is there a way around that issue? Do some touch screens work better than others in the rain?
ReplyDeleteIt seems 'they' are working on it...https://faculty.washington.edu/wobbrock/pubs/icmi-18.01.pdf
ReplyDelete