Last year I began an occasional series of trip reports
with the emphasis on the gear used for The Great Outdoors (there’ll be more
this year). This is the first one, a spring trip in April. Edited slightly.
For this first backpacking trip in over three months (due to the
lockdown) I decided it was wise not to be too ambitious. I knew I'd lost some
fitness and wasn't sure how my body would react to carrying a big pack. There
was snow on the hills too, soft deep snow. Wanting to break myself back in with
an easy trip I decided on a short walk, a low-level camp, and an ascent of some
lower hills. I picked two Grahams - hills between 2000 and 2500 feet (610 and
762 metres) - that I hadn't been up before. Carn Breac and Beinn na Feusaige
lie on the edge of the Torridon hills and reputedly had great views whilst not
themselves being at all distinctive. On the map the walking looked easy on wide
slopes with no obstacles though no paths were marked beyond the first few
kilometres into Coire Crubaidh.
The corrie floor was boggy, but I found a dryish patch just above the
stream for my camp. The only noise was the water racing over the stones. The
evening was chilly with clouds soon covering the sky. The morning came with a
hard frost. There was a touch of sun then the clouds rolled back in. I
breakfasted from my sleeping bag, delighted to be here.
Leaving the tent I set off up the glen and climbed to the long broad
ridge of Carn Breac. The going was tough on boggy tussocks and as I gained
height more and more snow patches appeared, far more than I'd expected. Hills of
similar height back home in the Cairngorms were mostly snow free. High up the
snow patches were soft and deep and often unavoidable. Not that the bogs
between them made for much easier walking. I weaved about trying to find the
easiest line between soft snow and squelchy ground. The views however were, as
promised, superb, especially those of Liathach and Beinn Eighe, white and
alpine.
Peat hags made the going even worse as I approached the second
summit. At one point a snow patch collapsed under me and suddenly I was over my
knees in freezing water. I levered myself out awkwardly then stomped uphill
trying to warm my feet. A herd of deer watched me and then wandered off,
probably thinking that such a clumsy, lumbering thing couldn't be a threat. I
love seeing deer, but I was well aware that these hills shouldn't be as bare as
they are and that over-grazing was the reason for that.
A very steep descent down heather thick slopes brought me back to
the corrie floor. At times I was clinging to heather roots. The walk was much
tougher than I expected. Back at the tent I slumped down with relief and
revived myself with hot chocolate and minestrone soup. I was asleep early.
Another frosty starry night ensued but the next morning I was woken by the sun
shining on my face from a cloudless sky. I lingered outside over a breakfast of
muesli and coffee, just listening to the stream rippling and watching the hills
glowing, before packing up and heading back down to the car.
PLANNING & PREPARATION
Planning the route on the map was easy. Planning gear required some
thought. The weather forecast was for calm dry weather with some sunshine. As
this was a spring trip that probably meant sub-zero temperatures at night, so a
warm sleeping system was advisable. As there was still some snow on the hills
and the ground would be wet from snowmelt, I might need ice axe and crampons
and boots would probably be more comfortable than shoes. Playing safe I went
for similar gear to that I’d have taken in midwinter, other than lighter boots
and, given the forecast, a lighter tent.
As always some of the items were well-proven, some were first-time test
gear, and some were long-term test gear. This meant the pack was a little heavier
than it could have been but at 14kg with three days food quite manageable. I
was only going to carry the full load for a few hours to camp anyway, leaving
the camping gear behind for the day on the hill.
Would I have changed anything? I’d have taken a lighter pack if I hadn’t
needed to test this one. I should have taken waterproof socks so I could wear
them in wet boots round camp. I didn’t need the ice axe or crampons, but I
almost did and wouldn’t leave them behind with snow on the hills. I didn’t need
my warm hat or several pairs of gloves either but again at this time of year I
wouldn’t go without them. My waterproofs never came out of the pack but of
course I’d never leave them behind.
THE GEAR
Equipment
Pack
Osprey Aether 65 Pack 2.4kg £220
****Likes comfortable, adjustable hipbelt
Dislikes heavy
Capacity 65 litres
Materials 420D High Tenacity Bluesign Nylon
Closure lid with buckles, zipped front panel
Back System adjustable, frame, injection moulded HDPE backpanel
Back Length 61cms (S/M)
Compartments 2
Pockets 2 external lid, 1 front, 2 side mesh, 2 hipbelt
Sizes S/M, L/XL
www.ospreyeurope.com
As I was taking
winter gear I needed a sizable pack, so this was a good opportunity to try the
latest version of Osprey’s well-established Aether 65 pack. I found it very
comfortable to carry and I loved the easy access to the contents provided by
the panel and top lid openings, lower compartment, and seven pockets. It
handled 14kg well and should be comfortable with much more. Stability was good
on rough ground. On the day on the summits I used it as a daypack and the side
and bottom compression straps meant I could reduce its volume so the contents
didn’t move around. The back system is adjustable and there are two sizes. The
smaller one fits me well. The padded sections of the hipbelt are adjustable
too, which I really like. The fabric feels tough, and the pack should last
well. There is just one drawback. The weight. This is a heavy pack. Now if
you’ll be carrying 20kg+ loads regularly I think 2.4kg for the pack is
acceptable but for loads below 20kg there are lighter weight packs, some much
lighter, that are just as comfortable.
Tent.
Sea to Summit Alto TR2 Plus 1.405kg £450 ****1/2 Best Buy Likes roomy, good headroom, two porches, multi-pitch options
Dislikes floor hydrostatic head on low side
Pitching multi option
Flysheet 15D sil/PU nylon ripstop, 1200mm hydrostatic head
Inner 20D nylon
Groundsheet 20D sil/PU nylon ripstop, 2500mm hydrostatic head
Poles DAC Featherlite
Pegs 8 x 15cm V
Porches 2
Inner Dimensions 215 x 134/97cm, peak 105cm
www.seatosummit.co.ukIn a two-person tents review in The Great Outdoors I gave the
Alto TR2 Plus Best Buy. Using it since then I’ve come to appreciate it even
more. Although designed for two it’s light enough for one and I really enjoyed
the space. Headroom is excellent and the porches are big. I put my pack and
boots in one porch and cooked in the other. On this trip there was no rain or
wind so I left the inner and outer doors open at night, revelling in the views
of the stars whenever I woke. As the nights were frosty condensation did form
on the flysheet despite the doors being open. This didn’t drip through the
inner though and the space meant I didn’t accidentally push against the damp
material. The hydrostatic head of the groundsheet is quite low but although I
was pitched on damp ground no moisture came through. On a long trip I’d use a
footprint though.
Sleeping Bag.
Big Agnes Sidewinder SL 20 1.05kg (R) ****1/2 £300 Recommended Likes lightweight, centre zip
Dislikes zip snags
Fill 650 fill power water repellent down, FireLine ECO recycled polyester
Shell nylon ripstop outer, polyester taffeta inner
Construction box wall
Zip centre, full-length
Sizes regular, long
Rating comfort -1C, lower comfort -7C
www.bigagnes.comMost sleeping bags are designed on the assumption that you sleep on your
back. I don’t. Ever. I sleep on my front and sometimes on my side, so I was
very interested to try the Sidewinder SL 20 as it’s designed for side sleepers
and meant to roll with you from one side to the other. It does too. I found it
very comfortable and although close-fitting it felt a little less restrictive
than some mummy bags. It has a centre zip, which I prefer as it makes it easier
to sit up in the bag and use it as an item of clothing. I was expecting
temperatures a little below zero, so the rating of the bag seemed just right.
The first night the overnight low was -1.8C, the second night -0.8C and I was
very warm on both.
As well as an unusual shape the Sidewinder has an unusual fill. The main
one is water-resistant down, but layers of a high loft synthetic are added in
the foot and at the hips to alleviate common pressure points for side sleepers.
The down doesn’t have a high fill power and the bag is a little heavier than
ones with higher fill power down but it’s still quite light.
Sleeping Mats.
Sea to Summit
Ultralight Regular 392g £92.50 ****1/2 Best BuyLikes comfort, light weight
Dislikes quite expensive
Type airbed
Materials 40D TPU laminated nylon
Dimensions 183 x 55cm
Thickness 5cm
Rating R-Value 0.7
www.seatosummit.co.uk
Lomo Folding
Camping Mat 410g £20 ****
Recommended
Likes tough, can’t deflate, low cost
Dislikes bulky, not that comfortable
Type closed cell foam
Materials silver coated egg box style closed cell foam
Dimensions 180 x 57cm
Thickness 2cm
Rating n/a
www.lomo.co.uk
I took two sleeping mats, one for
comfort and one for warmth. The combination worked really well. The Sea to
Summit Ultralight was very comfortable but definitely not warm enough on its
own. With it directly on the groundsheet I could feel the cold coming through.
Once on the Lomo mat it felt perfectly warm. I also used the Lomo mat folded up
as a seat. In terms of carrying the Ultralight packs away into a small bundle.
The Lomo mat is very bulky however, so I strapped it on the outside of the
lower compartment of the pack. Here it had one advantage. It meant the pack
would stand up on its own.
Stove.
Jetboil Stash 200 grams £140 ****1/2 Best BuyLikes lightweight, compact, efficient, heat exchanger
Dislikes poor wind resistance
Total Weight 200 grams
Burner Weight 60 grams
Pot Weight 140 grams
Pot Capacity 800ml
www.jetboil.com
This little stove
and pot combination is fast becoming a favourite. It’s ideal for one person,
boils water fast, and doesn’t weigh much.
The pot works well as a bowl as it’s not tall and narrow and has a
secure insulated handle. The burner isn’t designed for simmering as it’s not
regulated but I managed to turn the flame down enough to cook a pasta meal for
ten minutes without it sticking – I did stir it a fair bit. As I’ve found the
stove isn’t very wind resistant I brought a foil windscreen. However, I never
used this as the only breezes were light. The stove worked well on the frosty
mornings after being left in the tent porch. I didn’t notice any diminution of
boiling times. The stove doesn’t have an igniter, so I lit it with a Fire
Steel. I used the canister stabiliser supplied with the stove but will probably
leave this at home in future as the stove is quite stable without it.
Coffee.
GSI Coffee Rocket 75g
£13 ****1/2 Recommended
Likes light, easy to use
Dislikes small capacity
https://gsioutdoors.com/
An unforeseen result of the pandemic lockdowns has been a change in my
coffee drinking habits. Previously I had satisfied my liking for decent coffee
a few times a week in local coffee shops. At home and in the hills I drank
instant coffee – good quality instant but still not comparable with the real
thing. Missing my proper coffee I started making it at home and having acquired
a few little coffee makers I decided to take one on this trip. The GSI Coffee
Rocket consists of a nylon drip cone with a stainless-steel filter and a clear
polypropylene funnel. The drip cone has fold-out notched legs and fits on most
mugs. I used it with an old double-wall stainless steel MSR mug – taken because
I wanted my coffee to stay hot on frosty mornings but a bit heavy at 172 grams.
The Coffee Rocket itself only weighs 75 grams. I’ll take a lighter mug next
time.
The drip cone holds 10 grams of ground coffee and the funnel 230ml of
water. I’d rather it was bigger, so I didn’t have to make two mugs in the morning,
but it does produce good coffee and is easy to use and easy to clean. I’ll be
taking it on more trips.
Clothing & Footwear
Boots
Roclite Pro G 400 Gore-Tex boot 830g (size 9) £200
***** Best BuyLikes lightweight, durable, good grip
Dislikes nothing
Uppers Schoeller ceramic-coated fabric/Gore-Tex inner
Sole Graphene-Grip
www.inov-8.com
Since I started wearing these boots in the autumn of 2020 they’ve
become a favourite. They’re very light, they fit me perfectly and they are very
comfortable. The grip is excellent, as it needed to be on this trip where it
had to hold on sodden boggy ground, soft snow, and wet rocks. The cushioning is
good too and the sole just stiff enough for kicking steps in soft snow. After
they got soaked when I went through the snow into a pool they quickly warmed up
and stayed comfortable, undoubtably helped by the Gore-Tex inner and the
midweight merino wool socks I was wearing. The next morning they were still
sodden and a little crisp from the frost. Putting them and the wet socks on was
unpleasant but they soon warmed up and were fine for the walk out. When the
weather warms up I expect I’d find them a little hot. But then I’ll be wearing
trail shoes or sandals anyway.
With a Schoeller ceramic-coated upper and a sole containing
graphene the Roclite Pro G boots are designed to be tough and durable. So far,
they show no signs of wear. I’ll be wearing them much more to see just how long
they last.
Shirt
Alpkit Woodsmoke Mountain 380 grams (L) £70 ****
Recommended
Likes warmth, stud fastenings, cost
Dislikes pockets could be bigger
Fabric 95% Thermo-Tech polyester/5% spandex
Front closur studs
Pockets 2 stud-fastened chest
Cuffs studs
Sizes men S-XXL, women 8-16
www.alpkit.com
I wore
this shirt, another item that has become a favourite, throughout the trip as my
mid layer, with a thin merino mix base layer under it. It’s quite warm and only
in camp and at rest stops did I wear an insulated jacket over it. If there’d
been much of a wind I would have needed a layer over it though as it’s not very
wind resistant. Made from a brushed synthetic fabric the Woodsmoke is soft and
comfortable, wicks moisture away and feels good in a wide range of
temperatures. The fabric stretches slightly so it moves with you and has a
polygiene odour control treatment so it doesn’t stink. Having studs down the
front rather than a zip makes ventilating it easy without having to have it
wide open. The two chest pockets are useful but could be bigger – my smartphone
won’t fit in.
Other clothes
I wore Fjallraven Abisko Lite trousers throughout the trip, and
they were just right in terms of warmth. I also took a Fjallraven Abisko Lite
Trekking Jacket which I wore briefly during the walk-in to camp the first day
when I cold breeze sprang up for a short while. In camp and when I stopped on
top of Beinn Breac I wore a Patagonia Micro Puff, one of my favourite insulated
jackets. My unused waterproofs were a Black Diamond Highline jacket and
Berghaus Paclite trousers.